Raynool Blog
By Tony Huang | 23 May 2023 | 0 Comments

A comparison of Low Loss 200 and Low Loss 400 RG8

A comparison of Low Loss 200 and Low Loss 400


Structure and Dimension


Low Loss 200 Low Loss 400
Material Diameter Material Diameter
1 Inner Conductor Bare Copper 1.12 mm Copper Clad Aluminum 2.74 mm
2 Dielectric Foam PE 2.95 mm Foam PE 7.24 mm
3 Outer Conductor Aluminum Foil
Tinned Copper Braid
3.66 mm Aluminum Foil
Silver Plated Copper Braid
Nom. 8.13 mm
4 Jacket PE 4.95 mm PE 10.16 mm


Attenuation


Low Loss 200 Low Loss 400
Frequency Attenuation dB/m Attenuation dB/m
150 MHz 0.132 0.060
450 MHz 0.230 0.103
900 MHz 0.359 0.148
1500 MHz 0.477 0.194
1800 MHz 0.513 0.215
2500 MHz 0.609 0.268
6000 MHz 0.866 0.428

Electrical & Mechanical

Low Loss 200 Low Loss 400
Impedance 50 ohm 50 ohm
Velocity 85% 85%
Operating Temperature -40 to +85 ℃ -40 to +85 ℃
Min. Bend radius 12.7 mm 25.4 mm

Low Loss 200 and Low Loss 400 are both double shield flexible cable, Aluminum foil and Tinned plated Copper braiding, Low Loss 400 attenuation is half of Low Loss 200, and widely use on varies application. Low Loss 400 frequency can up to 7.5 GHz and RG214 frequency up to 6 GHz, Low Loss 200 diameter is 10.16 mm, have a half diameter of Low Loss 400.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.Required fields are marked. *
Name
E-mail
Content
Verification code
ver_code